“ … there is now overwhelming evidence that wealth is good for one’s well-being with no upper limit.”
He quoted research from the University of Michigan study by
Justin Wolfers and Betsey Stevenson published by the Brookings Institution of
1,014 individuals with varying incomes asking whether or not they were happy
and how satisfied they are with their lives.
(Back in the day 1974 Richard
Easterlin posited that increasing
average income did not raise average well-being, a claim that became known as
the 'Easterlin Paradox')
Stevenson and Wolfers found no evidence of a satiation
point. The income–well-being link when examining only the poor, is similar to that found when examining only
the rich.
Their study is confined
to the sorts of evaluative measures of life satisfaction and happiness and shows
that the focus of proponents of the (modified) Easterlin hypothesis to be questionable.
Income and well being
illustrated by Gallop world poll for cross country and inter country
comparisons show equivalent relationships in their study of 25 countries.
Life satisfaction rises logarithmically as GDP per Capital increases-rich nations have more satisfied citizens than poorer ones
Life satisfaction rises logarithmically as GDP per Capital increases-rich nations have more satisfied citizens than poorer ones
It will be interesting to see whether this study has any
effect on our views in selling and sales management when considering areas of
motivation – Hierarchy of needs, Vroom, Hygiene factors etc.
Measurements of happiness unlike measurements wealth are
subjective. Happy people with a positive outlook tend to do better at work and
are more likely to be appointed to
better paid jobs.
Related links
No comments:
Post a Comment