In 2005 the Sales Engagement study stated 75% of
the poll of Buyers said they wanted a relationship or to put it another way 25% were already saying they did not!
However by 2007 the Buyers’ views of Salespeople poll questions began to pick up
the change in the purchasing scene. We asked questions around the most recent significant
purchase both in terms of the aspects of the offering and the salesperson with
whom they did the business.
The Offering ranked as follows in the 2007 poll;-
2007 |
The ranking regarding the salesperson involved with the
Buyer’s most significant purchase was.
2007 |
We then asked the buyer respondents to decide which was more
important
2007 |
2007 |
The answers came across in favour of the offering!.
When I used to show this at conferences it caused quite a lot of murmuring and some grumbling from some quarters. Many salespeople believed relationship
as the only key.
Again others argued animatedly that the buyer only knows
about the offering through the benefits being described by the salesperson.
Well I was only being a provocative messenger - dare I say 'challenging' to the audiences to get them thinking.
Fairly new onto the bookshelves has come te excellent The Challenger Sale: Taking Control
of the Customer Conversation (Portfolio/Penguin: 2011) by
Matthew Dixon and Brent Adamson
The forward highlights ‘ breakthroughs’ of selling
- the history of sales
1. Front line sales and support account
developers e.g. Producers and collectors i.e. a defined selling role they
suggest first came from Insurance Inspectors
2. Psychology of Selling from 1925 EK
Strong et al
3. Drill down questioning models like
SPIN etc.based on research studies
4. Purchasing advancement through
supplier segmentation strategies, supplier chain management models
5. The Challenger sale - well it is selling the book and research so fair enough!
According to their study of complex selling they suggest the
Relationship Seller style is not the star performer.
“ Build relationships first
and the sales will follow “ concepts have long been off the selling skills fashion radar for a while now.
Most would agree with Dixon and Adamson
and will find their research both helpful and useful.
I also enjoyed the way Adamson and Dixon have kicked those hackneyed sales style ‘buckets’ around
– the hard-worker, challenger, relationship builder, lone wolf and reaction problem
solver.
Again nothing so very new here -in the UK 'Old School' trainers used to categorise salespeople into styles like
like the 'Aggressive', the ' Passive', the 'Schmoozer' etc.
Such descriptions have long gone passed
their usefulness.
A preview of the Buyers' views of Salespeople 2012 has picked up these 'changes' and the need for sales people to contest, challenge or even provoke as a trusted adviser.
Note how in the offering Price is very important across the the top 5 choices but only 9% put Price as their first choice. Challenges must me made around quality, technical specification, the Product/ Service.
Note how in the offering Price is very important across the the top 5 choices but only 9% put Price as their first choice. Challenges must me made around quality, technical specification, the Product/ Service.
The way Buyers now rank the offering and the qualities of the salespeople above. Notice the importance of Listening skills , Questioning ( Challenging) Skills along with adviser skills and how in the offering Price is very key overall but not in the first choice,
So let our selling be challenging in the best sense of the word. Sales is and should be a challenge.
Buying need to be respectedly challenged with courtesy and the good of the best deal for both parties.
( The TACK International Buyers' views of Salespeople 2012 is to be published shortly. for more information info@tack.co.uk
No comments:
Post a Comment